They have their inception in a condition of unrest, and derive their motive power on one hand from dissatisfaction with the current form of life, and on the other hand, from wishes and hopes for a new system of living’ (Blumer, p. as collective enterprises seeking to establish a new order of life. However, for those readers who prefer a definition I would offer up the one given by Herbert Blumer, which is quite open and therefore able to respond to a variety of circumstances: ‘Social movements can be viewed. As my intention in this article is to focus on logics of struggle rather than definitions of terms, I will not engage in these debates to any great extent. 4), to which a number of major figures in new social movements theory contributed. One focal point of these debates was the winter 1985 issue of Social Research (vol. The question of what constitutes a ‘social movement’ is extremely complex and has been debated. on anarchist theory and practice, with a focus on the tradition of ‘structural renewal’ that finds it apogee in the work of Gustav Landauer. To more fully comprehend current developments, it is necessary to construct an alternative genealogy based. Their work falls short, however, to the extent that it remains in other respects within the tradition of hegemonic thought. in the concept of constituent power developed. these shifts, they are implicitly acknowledged. Although most existing paradigms of social movement analysis have not addressed. with reference to a theoretical distinction between a politics of the act and a politics of demand. Along with this logic has come an emphasis on direct action tactics, which is discussed. Instead, these activist currents are driven by an anarchist logic of affinity. within (post)Marxism and (neo)liberalism. It notes that many elements of the ‘newest’ social movements have taken a turn away from the universalizing conception of social change that is characteristic of the logic of hegemony as it has developed. Drawing upon a critique of the (post)Marxist theory of hegemony and examples from contemporary activism, this article assesses new possibilities for the construction of radical alternatives within and against postmodern globalizing capitalism.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |